
As technology continues to evolve, our world is reshaped by new devices, artificial intelligence, and cutting-edge developments. Surgery is no exception. In recent years, there has been a rise of robotic surgeries seen in many common procedures, including inguinal hernia repairs.
In a recent Italian based study, Michele Schiano di Visconte investigated the economic value of robotic inguinal hernia repairs compared to the current standard, the laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
The findings were clear.
Robotic inguinal hernia repairs are substantially more expensive, yet provide very little, if any, added clinical benefit to the patient.
In fact, the only statistical differences were cost related, and they did not favor robotic repairs. Factoring in the use of the robot itself and longer surgery times (25-40 mins longer than laparoscopic repairs), the robotic repairs were found to be €2,224 more expensive per case. That translates to $2,586.23 USD in added costs per patient.
What does this prove?
“Fancier” does not always mean better. This study revealed that there was no difference in complication, readmission, or chronic pain rates for patients who underwent robotic repairs. The only meaningful distinction was the price. Therefore, as it stands, the robotic inguinal hernia repairs are not economically justifiable.
And perhaps the most surprising part? Neither the robotic or laparoscopic represent the best option for inguinal hernia repairs. As we investigated in our most recent blog post, The Truth About Hernia Repairs: New Study Favors Advanced Open Preperitoneal Repairs, new evidence continues to support the advanced open preperitoneal approach as the best repair for most patients.
With a shorter surgery, less anesthesia, less pain, and quicker recovery time, the open preperitoneal repair is both clinically and economically superior. This repair does not come without it’s challenges. Only surgeons who are experts at laparoscopic repair have the background to learn the open preperitoneal repair. Insurance reimbursement in the US is so low for this repair that hospitals and surgeons are eliminating it from what they offer to patients. That leaves the US with only a handful of surgeons who are experts in this repair and a surgical community that is looking for “prospective, randomized, double blinded” research to see if this repair is as good as it appears.
With all of that said, there is a time and place for laparoscopic and robotic hernia repairs. They can be the best approach for extremely complex hernias or for patients with a high BMI. However, for most people, the most straightforward approach is the best one.
The research:
MacQueen IT, Milky G, Shih IF, Zheng F, Chen DC. Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5153-5159. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11040-1. Epub 2024 Jul 22. PMID: 39039294
Reinhorn M, Fullington N, Agarwal D, Olson MA, Ott L, Canavan A, Pate B, Hubertus M, Urquiza A, Poulose B, Warren J. Posterior mesh inguinal hernia repairs: a propensity score matched analysis of laparoscopic and robotic versus open approaches. Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02680-0. Epub 2022 Sep 20. PMID: 36125632; PMCID: PMC9931785.
Rodrigues-Gonçalves V, Verdaguer-Tremolosa M, Martínez-López P, Fernandes N, Bel R, López-Cano M. Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4. PMID: 38704470
Schiano di Visconte M. (2025). Cost-utility of robotic versus laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia: a model‑based analysis from a public payer perspective. Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 30(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03513-6